SharpenCISO automates your DORA assessment, mapping your organization against DORA’s requirements and flagging gaps. Our specific integrations help you keep the assessment current as your environment changes, instead of a one-time exercise that’s outdated the moment it’s done.

SharpenCISO centralizes your DORA evidence in one place, pulled automatically from your existing systems or uploaded by your team. When an auditor or regulator asks, you have a single, always-current source of truth instead of a scramble to piece it together.

SharpenCISO tracks remediation progress; every gap, owner, and deadline visible in one place. You always know what’s fixed, what’s in progress, and what’s falling behind. Every decision related to each remediation is tracked, including exemption decision.

Under DORA, financial entities are responsible for the ICT risk their third parties introduce; not just their own. SharpenCISO automates ICT third-party assessment: scoring each provider’s risk at onboarding, keeping their information current in your Register of Information, and flagging any provider whose risk profile changes or whose reassessment is overdue. Instead of a manual review repeated inconsistently across vendors, you get one standardized process that keeps your entire ICT supply chain visible and audit-ready.

Building and maintaining DORA’s Register of Information by hand; across all required templates; is a recurring, error-prone task most teams dread. SharpenCISO keeps your Register of Information current, populated straight from your third-party data instead of rebuilt from spreadsheets every reporting cycle. When regulators ask for it, it’s already there, accurate and ready to submit; not assembled under deadline pressure.

DORA doesn’t stop at assessing a vendor’s risk; it requires your contracts with ICT providers to include specific security clauses and a documented exit strategy, in case that provider needs to be replaced. SharpenCISO tracks both directly against each vendor record: flagging contracts missing required security clauses, and confirming an exit strategy exists and stays current, instead of discovering the gap during an audit or, worse, during an actual provider failure.